← Back to portfolio

Formula SAE

Team Member

Formula SAE

This year, I designed and fabricated the safety hardware mounts, seat, and firewall for TM02, the team's electric car for 2027. In previous years, I built a radiator test bench that supported a 30% reduction in radiator size without compromising the car's cooling performance.

Chassis Integration

TM02's chassis was being designed alongside my components, but its geometry was driven by rule compliance and strength to weight optimization rather than component mounting. I had to fit the seat, firewall, and electrical hardware around the selected layout while meeting the requirements of the 2026 Formula Hybrid + Electric Handbook. Reconciling that layout with the interfaces to other components was the project's hardest design challenge.

Team chassis with the seat, firewall behind the seat, seat support crossmembers, and hardware mounts highlighted in blue, and the amber ready to move light and green tractive system status indicator illuminated.
Seat, firewall, and electrical hardware I integrated into the chassis, highlighted in blue.

Mounting Strategy

From the outset, I considered 3D printed mounts, metal clamps with locknuts, and welded chassis attachments for securing the electrical hardware. Printed mounts would make geometry revisions and manufacturing straightforward, but would offer less strength and stiffness than the metal options we were considering. Clamps would let us slide and rotate components along the chassis tubes during fitment, although retention would depend on friction at the tube interface. Locknuts would resist fastener loosening, but would not prevent a clamp from slipping if its friction capacity were exceeded.

Following my Conceptual Design Review, I chose welded chassis attachments for my components, prioritizing strength and rigidity over positional adjustability. Depending on the component, I secured parts to welded tabs with screws or welded their mounting brackets directly to the chassis. Screwed connections allowed removal, but the welded interfaces fixed the mounting locations. Driver reach, indicator visibility, and clearance therefore needed to be resolved before welding, since relocating any component would require significant rework.

Status Indicators

The tractive system was the car's electrical propulsion system. Its status indicator (TSSI) communicated the electrical state, while the ready to move light (RTML) signaled that propulsion was enabled. I packaged both on a shared bracket near the top of the main roll hoop, locating the TSSI above the RTML and within 150 mm of the hoop's top to be rule compliant. This arrangement had to preserve visibility and helmet clearance while remaining inside the rollover protection envelope, the space protected by the roll hoops and bracing.

Gray bent sheet metal indicator bracket with an illuminated green TSSI, unlit red TSSI, and glowing amber ready to move light. Two rows of bright sources and reflector cells remain visible through the amber cover, casting soft light onto the floor.
Shared indicator bracket with the green TSSI on, the red TSSI off, and the amber RTML illuminated.

I designed this bracket as one bent sheet metal part so its profile could be cut on the waterjet. Four bends formed the flat sheet into a bracket with opposing indicator faces; I welded the finished bracket directly to the chassis. The sheet included bend reliefs where the bends terminated to limit tearing and distortion. I also accounted for bend allowance, the material needed to form each curved corner, so the finished bracket had the correct dimensions.

Shadowless flat layout of the TSSI and RTML bracket with two oval lamp openings, four round indicator holes, additional rounded edge relief slots, and four blue bend center lines.
Flat layout with bend reliefs, bend allowance, and bends marked in blue.

Safety Hardware

I designed the cockpit bracket around the shutdown and start buttons and two fault indicators, with the shutdown button positioned for a belted driver to reach at any steering angle. The indicators displayed faults detected by the accumulator management system (AMS), which monitored the traction battery, and the insulation monitoring device (IMD), which checked electrical isolation between the tractive system and chassis.

Gray cockpit mounting bracket with a large red emergency shutdown button, two smaller red lights labeled AMS and IMD, and a gray START button.
Cockpit bracket designed around the shutdown and start buttons, with AMS and IMD fault indicators above.

The car had separate master switches for its low voltage electronics and tractive system. I placed both on a shared plate to the right of the main roll hoop, the best location that satisfied the rules and accommodated the surrounding components. Height and external access requirements set the switch positions; I shaped the plate to connect that layout to the chassis. Each switch had a central clearance opening and two fastening holes, keeping the mounting interfaces in one flat part for straightforward waterjet cutting.

Two red handled rotary master switches on a neutral mounting plate, with the switch bodies and mounting holes visible.
Low voltage and tractive system master switches on the shared mounting plate.

The rules required the side shutdown buttons, or big red buttons (BRBs), to be accessible from outside the car. I mounted them facing outward behind the driver at approximately head height. Each plate had a keyed switch cutout to fix the button orientation and an extended attachment area that connected it to the chassis.

Side emergency shutdown button and custom mounting bracket shown in a neutral CAD render.
External shutdown button on its side mounting bracket.

The cockpit, master switch, and side shutdown mounts were flat plate profiles with through holes. I cut the plates using a waterjet, incorporating each component's chassis attachment interface in a simple cutting operation.

Seat & Firewall

Last year's simple metal seat accommodated all our drivers, but it was their main complaint: poor visibility forced them to crane their necks, compromising comfort and racing performance. Our drivers ranged from 5 feet to 6 feet 4 inches and varied in width, so the replacement had to accommodate different body proportions without repeating those compromises.

I used a PVC cockpit rig with a wooden backrest to measure driver seating positions, reach, and sightlines before fixing the seat contour. The seat angle also had to work beneath the main roll hoop, the protective structure behind the driver. The rules required at least 50.8 mm of helmet clearance from the hoop and bracing lines for every driver and a 95th percentile male template.

Driver seated on an inclined wooden backrest in a PVC cockpit mockup, with feet extended toward the front of the rig.
One of our drivers in the cockpit rig during my seat measurement session.

I recorded hip to foot distance, knee height and angle, and steering wheel position alongside a side view of the seated driver. The shaded region in the sketch estimates the forward blind spot, where the cockpit obstructs the driver's view of the road. Raising the driver could reduce this blind spot but consumed helmet clearance, while changing recline also changed reach and knee position. These dimensions had to be evaluated together, rather than choosing seat angle for comfort alone.

Handwritten cockpit fitting sketch on graph paper with driver measurements, seat and knee angles, roll hoop heights, steering wheel dimensions, and a shaded forward blind spot.
Driver fitting measurements and a side view sightline sketch.

I translated the fitting measurements into a common seat contour, then fabricated a fiberglass shell over a 3D printed mold. Custom foam inserts for each driver, combined with an adjustable pedal box, accommodated the height differences without separate shells. Each seating position had to retain the required helmet clearance with the inserts fitted. This arrangement was intended to improve comfort and racing performance at this year's competition.

I mounted the seat on the two support crossmembers beneath the pan and behind the backrest, tying the chosen recline to both chassis supports. I also positioned openings for the 6 point harness to minimize interference with driver comfort.

Contoured driver seat shell with curved side supports and mounting openings, rendered from the front quarter.
Seat shell with separate mounting points at the pan and backrest.

The firewall separated the driver from the accumulator, the car's traction battery pack, and other tractive system components. I designed its outline, angles, and mounting locations around the chassis, with coverage determined by the tallest driver and the components behind it.

I cut the panel and mounting holes from sheet metal, then fitted it to the cockpit before sealing its perimeter against the sides and floor. The mounting interfaces had to preserve that continuous barrier.

Upright firewall CAD panel with a shaped perimeter and raised mounting locations, rendered in a neutral metallic finish.
Sheet metal firewall panel with perimeter mounting points.

Brake Lights & Ready to Drive Buzzer

I designed a shared flat backing plate for both rear brake lights near the car's rear centerline, between wheel centerline height and driver shoulder height. The plate fixed the lamps relative to each other and was cut from flat stock without the forming operations required by the status indicator bracket.

Diagonal isometric view of two glowing red brake lights on their upright gray mounting plate. Brighter individual sources and reflector cells remain visible through each cover, with soft red illumination on the ground in front.
Rear brake light assembly with a shared backing plate.

The ready to drive buzzer provided an audible warning when the car could respond to accelerator input. It came with a right angle bracket, which I welded directly to the chassis without an additional custom mount.

Ready to drive warning buzzer and its supplied right angle bracket shown in a standalone CAD render.
Ready to drive buzzer with its supplied mounting bracket.

Radiator Test Bench

For an earlier combustion car, I built a custom test bench to characterize radiator performance through heat rejection, flow rate, and pressure differential measurements. Manufacturer specifications had not matched the performance we were seeing on the car, so the bench let us evaluate the radiator under controlled coolant flow and airflow conditions.

Heated coolant circulated through the radiator at known flow rates while temperature sensors recorded inlet and outlet conditions. A variable speed fan controlled airflow through the core. Varying these conditions produced heat rejection curves as a function of coolant flow, air velocity, and temperature differential.

The printed duct connected the radiator at the larger rear opening to the fan at the smaller front opening. Foam end pieces and duct tape sealed the interfaces so air passed through the core rather than leaking around the test section.

Radiator test bench viewed from the right, with a warm graphite 3D printed duct, foam flanges, and soft contact shadows.
Radiator test bench CAD, with the radiator interface at the larger opening and fan mounting points at the smaller opening.

Testing showed that the previous radiator was oversized for the car's heat loads. The results supported a 30% reduction in radiator size without compromising cooling performance, reducing weight and freeing space within the sidepods.

Electric Water Pump

The same combustion car developed temperature spikes during extended idle periods. Its mechanical water pump was driven by the engine, so coolant circulation fell with engine speed. I proposed an electric pump to maintain circulation independently of engine RPM.

Adding the electric water pump eliminated the idle temperature spikes and simplified the cooling system by removing the mechanical pump drive. Power draw was minimal relative to the alternator capacity.

← Back to portfolio